- Home
- Creative & Digital
- Economics
- Education
- Environment & Planning
- Health
- Indigenous
- International
- Justice
- Politics
- Social Policy

23 September 2009The evidence suggests that one-off payments can play an important role in cushioning a downturn, writes Andrew Leigh in andrewleigh.com
HOW EFFECTIVE are household handouts in kickstarting a flagging economy? Are they a fast and effective means of boosting demand? Or are stimulus payments like taking a bucket of water from the deep end of a pool and dumping it into the shallow end (as George Mason University economist Russell Roberts has argued)?
Compared with infrastructure projects – which typically take over a year to commence construction – sending cheques to households has the virtue that it can be done in a few months. Yet there has been considerable debate in the academic literature over their efficacy. For Australians, this debate is more than an academic bunfight: if household handouts are always saved, the federal government just sent out $20 billion to no effect...
Photo: Brian Pamphilon/ iStockphoto