Skip to main content

login

An initiative of Swinburne Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University

Australian Policy Online
Research & Evidence Base

Swinburne Institute for Social Research

Search form

  • Topics
  • Sections
  • Collections
  • Browse
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contribute
  • Subscribe
  • Research
  • Commentary
  • Audio
  • Book Reviews
  • Guides
  • Video
  • Websites
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Courses
  • Calls
  • Notices
  • Book Listings
  • Creative & Digital
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Indigenous
  • International
  • Justice
  • Politics
  • Social Policy
  • Urban Policy & Design
  • Community
  • Cultural diversity
  • Families & households
  • Gender & sexuality
  • Immigration & refugees
  • Population
  • Poverty
  • Religion & faith
  • Social inclusion
  • Social problems
  • Welfare
  • Youth

You are here

Home » Social Policy

Why unemployment benefits need to be increased

Peter Whiteford
09 December 2010 | Since 1996 Newstart for a single person has fallen from around 54 per cent to 45 per cent of the after-tax minimum wage, writes Peter Whiteford in Inside Story. It isn’t enough to live on

•

ONE of the more surprising newspaper stories of recent times was Peter Martin’s article of 15 November, OECD Takes Aim at Labor Policies, which reported that the latest OECD Economic Survey of Australia had declared that Australia’s unemployment benefits are too low. I can’t recall the OECD ever before saying that a country’s unemployment benefits weren’t generous enough – and I worked there for eight years.

According to the OECD, the current level of the Newstart Allowance has “raised concerns about its adequacy” as an income support payment. “Unlike most OECD countries,” says the report, “Australia provides a flat (non-earnings related) means-tested allowance to meet social risks such as unemployment, which may be paid for an unlimited period… The resulting net replacement rate is below the OECD average for the initial stage of unemployment.” In fact, for a single person at the average wage losing their job, Australian benefits are about the lowest in the OECD…

Read the full article

Photo: Andrew Jeffrey

Permanent URL
http://apo.org.au/node/23481
Views
3259

Topics

  • Economics
    • Income & wealth
    • Unemployment
  • Social Policy
    • Poverty
    • Social inclusion
    • Welfare

Keywords

Unemployment benefit

More like this

  • What works best in reducing child poverty: a benefit or work strategy?
  • Will the budget slow the growth of disability support pension numbers?
  • Pulling our welfare weight
  • Increasing the Newstart Allowance: A necessary part of equitable fiscal stimulus
  • Poverty in Australia

Advertisement

Most viewed this week

Does culture need explaining?
More than temporary: Australia's 457 visa program
Gone solar
On efficiency and effectiveness: some definitions
“Just do it” – making and measuring social impact

Subscribe

Subscribe    Twitter @ozpolicyonline    Facebook AustralianPolicyOnline

Australian Policy Online © apo.org.au 2013             Email: admin@apo.org.au | Phone: 03 9214 5609

Policy Online is an initiative of the Swinburne Institute for Social Research in partnership with: RMIT University | ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation (CCI) | Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN) | School of Government, Victoria University of Wellington | National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF)