Research report

The effectiveness of parliamentary oversight in defence procurement: an international comparison of Joint Strike Fighter procurements

16 Aug 2017
CREATORS
This paper assesses the effectiveness of the Australian Parliament and its supporting agencies in conducting oversight of major defence procurements in comparison with other nations, using the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) procurement as a case study.

150

84

Share

Description

The internationally collaborative and generally synchronous Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program offers an opportunity to compare procurement oversight between different partner nations. In democracies, parliamentary oversight plays an important role in public accountability and transparency.

This paper assesses the effectiveness of the Australian Parliament and its supporting agencies in conducting oversight of major defence procurements in comparison with other nations, using the JSF procurement as a case study. It compares the roles and effectiveness of Australia’s parliamentary committees, the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) and the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) with the equivalent committees and agencies of the United States, Canada, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Parliamentary oversight in Australia is hampered by the different roles of different committees and the organisations which contribute to Parliamentary oversight, resulting in fractured rather than unified oversight.

Advertisement

 

PUBLICATION DETAILS

Resource Type: 
APO URI: http://apo.org.au/node/102826
Publication Place: 
Canberra
Series Title: 
Parliamentary Library of Australia 'Summer Scholar' papers
Language: 
License Type: 
CC BY-NC-ND