Report

Chronic disease management: the role of private health insurance

4 Oct 2013
Description

The paper provides background information on private health insurance arrangements, as well as the challenges emerging from increasing rates of chronic disease, and discusses the role of Broader Health Cover.

Introduction

In 2007, a series of major reforms to private health insurance (PHI) were introduced with the passage of the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 (PHIA). One of the key reforms, in fact ‘the most significant new measure’ according to the then Health Minister Tony Abbott, was Broader Health Cover (BHC). BHC allows health insurers to offer benefits to members for programs that either prevent or substitute for hospitalisation, or that help patients with a chronic disease better manage and reduce the effects of that disease.  In effect, these reforms were intended to give health insurers a more significant role in keeping their members healthy.

A range of benefits was expected to flow from this initiative. Evidence from overseas shows that patients covered by such programs stay healthier for longer, and have their chronic conditions better managed. Health insurers could benefit because over time they would face fewer, less expensive claims. PHI members could benefit as well, as fewer expensive claims should reduce some of the cost pressures that drive health insurance premiums to rise. More broadly, the health system could benefit because a healthier population should reduce pressure on public hospitals, as well as reduce costs overall.

Several years have passed since the introduction of BHC so it is timely to look at its implementation and begin to assess its impacts. As a preliminary step, this paper will focus on reporting on the uptake of BHC services, including the range of chronic disease management programs (CDMP) now available, the benefits paid for these and any evidence pointing to the effectiveness of these programs.

Whether BHC has benefited the health system and led to lasting improvements in health outcomes is probably too early to say. A wide range of variables would need to be considered and given the multidimensional and complex nature of the system it may be too difficult to assess this. Instead, this paper aims to fill some gaps in knowledge about the implementation of BHC, in order to contribute towards a better understanding of the role such programs can play, and to promote further debate and investigation. Because health insurance is subsidised by the Australian taxpayer via the private health insurance rebate, there is also a public interest in a better understanding of the impact of these programs.

The paper will start by providing some brief background information on private health insurance arrangements, as well as the challenges emerging from increasing rates of chronic disease, before moving to a discussion of BHC and its role.

Publication Details
Published year only: 
2013
4
Share
Share
Subject Areas
Geographic Coverage
Advertisement