- Home
- Creative & Digital
- Economics
- Education
- Environment & Planning
- Health
- Indigenous
- International
- Justice
- Politics
- Social Policy
| Funding for HIV and non-communicable diseases: implications for priority setting in the Pacific region |
Image: *TreMichLan* / Flickr17 June 2010There has been increasing global interest in documenting funding flows for health, but none of that work has focused on the Pacific region. This paper outlines external funding for two specific areas of overseas development assistance (ODA) for health in the region—HIV/AIDS and non-communicable diseases (NCDs)—during 2002-09. These are compared to the comparative disease burdens, and some initial thoughts are presented on the dynamics of setting donor health priorities in the Pacific.
Methods: Empirical data on development partner aid funding were accessed through a review of web sites, annual reports, published data, funding proposals and other publicly available documentation of donor country aid agencies, multilateral agencies and programs and that of recipient governments. The document review was supplemented by 27 key informant interviews to verify and clarify the available data. Interviewees were drawn mainly from bilateral and multilateral agencies active in the Pacific and researchers working in the field. The HIV
component was commissioned work for the Commission on AIDS in the Pacific.
Results: Despite much higher mortality rates from NCDs, external funding for HIV is higher than for NCDs. From
2002 to 2009, funding totalled US$68,481,730 for HIV and US$32,910,778 for NCDs. External assistance for HIV activities in the Pacific in 2009 was more than US$18 million, while funding for NCDs in the same year was almost US$12 million.
Conclusions: Despite cooperation from many agencies, the funding data were difficult to gather, highlighting the need for greater transparency of funding information and more thorough record keeping. The external funding does not align with the disease and mortality figures, and further interviews suggested that donor funding decisions in the region are driven not by local priorities but by factors including a strong global HIV community, the commitment to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the lack of coherence in the way NCDs are presented to policy makers.
Image: Papuan AIDS sign, *TreMichLan* / Flickr