Heads, you die: bad decisions, choice architecture, and how to mitigate predictable irrationality

09 July 2009Modern societies are organised around the assumption that people are perfectly rational - an assumption out of touch with the latest evidence from brain research. It is also out of touch with common sense. This paper argues that policymakers should design choice contexts for social outcomes – an approach called ‘choice architecture’.

While sometimes calculating and rational, people are also irrational in predictable ways. We are influenced by framing and social contexts. We are motivated by factors other than price: social norms, habits, morality, formal and informal authority, non-monetary incentives, community expectations, and the way choices are presented.

Two themes run throughout this paper. Firstly, that choice architecture offers a range of tools to solve problems and save resources, without resorting to either mandates or laissez-faire approaches. Secondly, that there is a progressive rationale for designing choice contexts, to improve patterns of choice in relation to social outcomes and individual lives.

Choice architecture employs five tools to design the contexts in which people make choices:

1. Setting the default option in a set of choices

2. Offering ‘self-contracting’ to support commitment

3. Presenting and organising information

4. Designing physical spaces to guide behaviour

5. Supporting the development of social norms

The applications of choice architecture are immediate. Rebuilding a resilient economy will require behaviourally-informed regulation, and improving health and sustainability outcomes will require policies informed by realistic human decision-making. Its applications are also long term. Policies based on a real account of human decision-making will enable communities, organisations, and government to improve social outcomes. By focusing on how physical and social environments shape choice patterns, and how choices are framed, we can put markets to the service of a better society.

Noticeboard

07 March 2012

In May 2011 the Federal Government announced that the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) would commence operations from 1 July 2012 and that it would initially be responsible for determining the legal status of groups seeking charitable, public benevolent institution, and other not-for-profit (NFP) benefits on behalf of all Commonwealth agencies. 

01 March 2012


The Productivity Commission has been asked to report within 9 months on Regulatory Impact Analysis: Benchmarking. The study requires a benchmarking of the efficiency and quality of regulatory impact analysis processes used by the Commonwealth and state and territory governments, as well as those of the Council of Australian Governments.
20 December 2011

On 18 November 2011, Parliamentary Secretary for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Senator the Hon Kate Lundy, announced the establishment of an independent panel of eminent community leaders to conduct an inquiry into Australian Government services to ensure they are responsive to the needs of Australians from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.