At home and in place? The role of housing in social inclusion

Final report
Image: See-ming Lee / flickr

04 November 2011This project focused on housing in affecting social inclusion/exclusion. It reinforced the notion that exclusion is much more than simply loss of housing through homelessness. People can be socially excluded through having their options limited to poor quality and insecure accommodation in unsafe neighbourhoods, with few job prospects and inadequate services. Two particular types of social exclusion (using a categorization developed in the UK) were found to be relevant to this study: deep social exclusion (for people who experience multiple or cumulative disadvantage, such as many who are homeless); and concentrated exclusion (where disadvantages might be found in particular groups or locations).

Image: See-ming Lee / flickr

 

In the case of deep social exclusion, the evidence suggests the most effective programs are those that have a dual focus on individuals, but also on the wider systemic processes that maintain inequality. Effective interventions involve provision of secure (especially long term) housing accompanied by support services—so that the support follows the person. Responses also need to be tailored to the individual since no one type of intervention will suit all.

In the case of concentrated exclusion, area based approaches (such as Neighbourhood Renewal Strategies) were found to be effective in improving place outcomes (in relation to crime and safety, housing and the physical environment and community outcomes) but the impacts on individuals (e.g. in health, education or worklessness) is unclear. Any effective ‘narrowing of the gap’ requires sustained investment in locations that are disadvantaged. Policies which aim to diversify housing tenure might bring benefits for those living in the neighbourhood, but not necessarily for those who are required to relocate. In some cases addressing deep social exclusion may be at odds with addressing concentrated exclusion.

The concepts of social inclusion need to be incorporated in policy evaluation frameworks for it to be of consequence to policy-makers. Evaluators need to consider the objectives of the intervention, collect baseline data, and analyse how interventions lead to changed outcomes.  

 

Noticeboard

07 March 2012

In May 2011 the Federal Government announced that the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) would commence operations from 1 July 2012 and that it would initially be responsible for determining the legal status of groups seeking charitable, public benevolent institution, and other not-for-profit (NFP) benefits on behalf of all Commonwealth agencies. 

07 February 2012
The Productivity Commission has been asked to report within 8 months on Default Superannuation Funds in Modern Awards. The inquiry covers the design of criteria for the selection and ongoing assessment of superannuation funds for nomination as default funds in modern awards.
20 December 2011

On 18 November 2011, Parliamentary Secretary for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Senator the Hon Kate Lundy, announced the establishment of an independent panel of eminent community leaders to conduct an inquiry into Australian Government services to ensure they are responsive to the needs of Australians from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.