APO resource visit counts have been improved. For more information, see our Policies & Guidelines

Journal article

Is non-subject based research training a ‘waste of time’, good only for the development of professional skills? An academic literacies perspective

21 Nov 2013
Description

In recent years, contentiously for some, universities have developed generalist skills lists and associated curricula in response to government demand for more ‘employment-ready’ graduates. Such training usually includes writing and communication. In Australia and the UK, guidelines designed to support the development of skills programmes describe research training as ‘generic skills’ and/or ‘discipline-based’. This framing effectively precludes a discussion of academic literacies perspectives on curriculum development and pedagogy for research training. In a review of some key insights from academic literacies and consideration of their implications for research training, the article discusses why academic literacies are not skills-based, strictly generic or informed by the students' discipline. The article suggests a reframing of the terms of research skills discussion to accommodate academic literacies perspectives. This would involve recognition of curriculum and pedagogy that aims to introduce the complex and diverse written genres, research purposes, rhetorical conventions, language functions and cultural norms that students are working with, an approach supportive of both effective student writing and subject learning.

Publication Details
Identifiers: 
DOI: 
10.1080/13562517.2013.860106
Volume: 
19
Issue: 
4
Pagination: 
373-384
Access Rights Type: 
Paid subscription required
Language: 
English
License Type: 
All Rights Reserved
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes
Published year only: 
2013
6
Share
Share
Collections
Subject Areas
Advertisement