How does the investor/developer view the urban design challenge? The equation is straightforward from a commercial perspective: any additional costs arising from improved urban design need to be compensated by a sufficient increase in returns.
The additional return requirement is not necessarily a linear function of costs. If the urban design improvements are deemed to be highly risky, for example, mixed-used development in a low density suburban environment where the tried and true product is detached housing, then the investor will want a premium on standard returns.
Luckily, it has been demonstrated that developers can, indeed, make a more than satisfactory return from lifting their investment in urban design. The returns come in a variety of forms including higher rentals from tenants and better prices from end-buyers who are happy to pay for superior amenity and environmental perlormance. Other benefits for the urban design-sawy developer include lower operating costs, lower tenant turnover and vacancy rates, enhanced reputation and market credibility for the investor and a more robust, 'future proofed', real estate project. As more developers learn of these benefits, the general quality of urban design can be expected to improve.
Urban Design Forum 2013
All Rights Reserved
Urban voices: celebrating urban design in Australia