While you’re here… help us stay here.

Are you enjoying open access to policy and research published by a broad range of organisations? Please donate today so that we can continue to provide this service.


What works best in reducing child poverty: a benefit or work strategy?

Children Poverty Australia
Attachment Size
apo-nid3749.pdf 449.9 KB

This paper assesses the extent to which child poverty is associated with the work status of parents. Whiteford and Adema find that in nearly all OECD countries child poverty rates are significantly higher for jobless families than for families with at least one parent in employment, and are also higher in single-earner families than in two-earner families, and in sole-parent households compared to two-parent households. While jobless families are nearly everywhere the most disadvantaged among the poor, the analysis finds, that on average across OECD countries only around one-third of poor families with children are jobless, although this ratio varies widely – from less than 20 per cent (Austria, Greece, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Portugal, Turkey and the United States) to 60% or more (Australia, the Czech Republic, Germany and Norway).

The paper also discusses possible policy directions for OECD countries. The fact that all countries with very low child poverty rates (less than 5 per cent) combine low levels of family joblessness and effective redistribution policies supports the view that successful anti-poverty strategies should seek a balanced approach combining improved benefits where necessary and improved incentives to work. The paper assesses the extent to which child poverty can be reduced by policies which successfully promote higher parental employment and more effective benefit systems, identifying wide variations across countries in the effectiveness of different policy approaches.

Publication Details
Access Rights Type: