Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Discussion paper

Checking for MistAIkes, the hidden negative externalities in the AI productivity debate


Approaches to regulating artificial intelligence (AI) have turned from discussions around safety, ethics and human rights, into ones around productivity, efficiency and worker outputs. This report is a literature review around current AI productivity claims. It is intended to provide key insights and evidence-based counterpoints to current claims around AI productivity.
Discussion paper

A public, Australian AI


The author of this paper argues that Australia must invest in sovereign capability in artificial intelligence (AI), with a public good imperative to service the community’s ongoing needs. Taxing large technology companies appropriately, and generating special levies, or charging them for the datasets they use, could contribute towards developing a sovereign, public AI infrastructure in...
Discussion paper

Government’s forced rollout of facial recognition for home quarantine needs strict limits and protections


This paper argues that as state governments begin trialling home quarantine programs, they need to take active steps to ensure they are not crossing a new frontier in the surveillance of citizens by using facial recognition technology.
Discussion paper

Please check-in: a blueprint for a safe, fair and ethical vaccination 'passport'


Mass vaccination is needed to mitigate against the effects of COVID-19, and to help Australia start to ease restrictions. This paper explores some fundamental principles which form the blueprint for a safe and ethical 'vaccination passport' system.
Discussion paper

The Public Square project


In recent times, online platforms like Facebook have usurped core aspects of what we expect from a public square. This discussion paper aims to initiate a focused discussion around the type of digital infrastructure we want to power our public square.

ADVERTISEMENT