Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Journal article
Document cover
ShareSHARE

Injured workers' experiences of general practitioner care across dual healthcare funding systems: a qualitative study in an Australian workers' compensation context

Daniel Griffiths, Danielle Mazza, Alex Collie
Journal
Occupational health and safety Qualitative research General practice Medicare Patients Workers' compensation Injury Australia
Description

This study investigates how injured workers in Australia experience general practitioner (GP) care following compensable injury. Their GP care is funded by two distinct systems: Workers’ Compensation and Medicare. While operated separately at a structural level, these systems intersect in general practice, creating complex administrative dynamics for patients and treating clinicians. 

Key Findings 

  • Through in-depth qualitative interviews, the research reveals a highly fragmented healthcare landscape. 
  • Injured workers preferred a whole-person approach to care through a single GP managing all health conditions. They reported challenges in finding GPs willing to take on workers’ compensation cases due to system complexity. 
  • Workers arranged their care for other health conditions around administrative complexities of compensable injury. Their care experiences varied with which GP they saw. 

Recommendations

  • To prevent recovery and return-to-work delays, scheme administrators must streamline administrative processes for primary care providers. 
  • Better cross-system integration and policy visibility over how Medicare and workers’ compensation overlap in practice are essential to reduce administrative friction, prevent care gaps and better support worker outcomes.
Publication Details
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
License type:
CC BY
Access Rights Type:
open