Discussion paper
A little more valuation, a little less redaction, please
Analysis of unredacted Condamine-Balonne water valuation documents
Publisher
Irrigation
Government procurement
Ministerial conduct
Water governance
Government accountability
Australia
Description
This research is based on unredacted valuation documents about the $80 million ‘Watergate’ scandal.
The documents, provided to independent Senator Rex Patrick last week after a two-year battle, contain the commercial valuation commissioned by the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (DAWR) for negotiations with the vendor.
Key findings:
- The Commonwealth paid $2,745 per megalitre, nearly double the $1,500/ML price recommended by the valuer it commissioned, almost 20% more than the top of the valuation range of $1,100 - $2,300/ML.
- The valuation documents contradict claims by the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources that the valuer “stated that the department should be prepared to pay” a premium for the water rights.
- The valuation documents also contradict the Australian National Audit Office finding that prices paid in strategic water purchases were equal to the maximum price determined by valuations.
Publication Details
Copyright:
The Australia Institute 2020. Reproduced with permission
License type:
All Rights Reserved
Access Rights Type:
open
Post date:
18 Aug 2020
