How to run the next multi-year spending review
This report shows how the UK Government's existing spending review process fails to align government spending with strategic priorities and long-term value for money. It recommends resetting the approach to spending reviews and introduces more effective ways of managing public spending.
The new UK government has taken office with a bold set of missions: it has pledged to, for example, secure the highest sustained growth rate in the G7 and deliver zero carbon electricity by 2030. These pledges come on top of a daunting inheritance, with most public services performing worse now than they were in 2010 or before the pandemic.
This report argues that ambitious targets will require a substantial reorientation of government activity, including how and where it spends money, ensuring that every pound spent delivers the greatest possible value.
Key recommendations
- Define the government’s missions in a ‘Priorities for Government’ framework, to guide decision making in the spending review and enable the prioritisation of spending
- Set multi-year spending plans covering five years, which would be reviewed every three years
- Publish multi-year spending plans at least six months before they come into effect
- Establish a regular cycle and method for spending reviews
- Review demand-led spending and tax expenditures
- Avoid early settlements and the ‘protection’ of individual budgets from the start of the spending review process
- Produce and publish robust multi-year spending baselines for each department at the start of the spending review process
- Task an independent body to scrutinise multi-year spending baselines and plans, and
- Reset and align expectations of how evidence is used in spending review allocations
