An overview of the key issues related to moving to four-year terms for the Australian House of Representatives. The paper covers the history of the proposal, arguments for and against, potential economic implications and key design choices if four-year terms are to be implemented. It seeks to promote informed debate on the issue. 

The report notes the length of the term is a key element of Australia’s democratic architecture. Whether or not three-year terms remain fit-for-purpose in a contemporary context is a debate that Australia should welcome. It finds potential for significant economic benefit, tempered by concerns around democratic accountability.

Key findings

• Most Australian states and territories have four-year terms, whereas the Commonwealth government has three year terms.
• The change would require constitutional amendments, as such, it would require broad bipartisan support.