Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Submission
ShareSHARE

Federation of Community Legal Centres (Vic) submission to the Victorian government access to justice review

Publisher
Legal services Social justice Access to justice Alternative dispute resolution Australia
Resources
Attachment Size
download linkapo-nid67806.pdf 608.86 KB
Description

The Federation welcomes the Victorian Government’s Access to Justice Review, and the opportunity to identify improvements that can be made at a state level to address the access to justice crisis.

The Federation, along with many member CLCs, made substantial contributions to the Productivity Commission’s 2013-14 Inquiry into Access to Justice Arrangements. We support many of the findings and recommendations of that inquiry and have been disappointed that the Australian Government has not yet responded to the Productivity Commission’s September 2014 final report.

While we await a response from the Australian Government, we note that tackling uneven access to justice and building a fairer, more effective legal system will also take action and investment at a state level. We look forward to working with the Victorian Access to Justice Review Team (the Review Team) and the Victorian Government on changes necessary to help the most disadvantaged and vulnerable in this state.

This submission articulates some key points the Federation thinks are important for the Review Team to consider. These are intended to summarise and complement the points made in the submissions of our member centres, as well as to represent the agreed positions of the Federation as a whole.

This submission should be read in conjunction with the joint submission of the Community Development and Community Legal Education Working Group of the Federation and Victoria Legal Aid, which addresses the provision of community legal education as a core element of legal service delivery.

We understand that the review process will include a series of round tables and further direct consultations, and look forward to providing further input on detailed proposals and specific issues as the Review Team’s work progresses.

Publication Details
Access Rights Type:
open