Constitutionalising the franchise and the status quo: the High Court on prisoner voting rights

Graeme Orr

Report

SHARE

Constitutionalising the franchise and the status quo: the High Court on prisoner voting rights

24 Oct 2007

Graeme Orr

Publisher

Democratic Audit of Australia

Courts Elections Prisons Democracy Social issues Human rights Constitutional law Australia

Resources

Attachment	Size
apo-nid8743.pdf	48.26 KB

Description

In the wake of the High Court’s decision on prisoner enfranchisement, Graeme Orr describes the issue of prisoner disenfranchisement as a continuing ‘political football’ in this new paper.

Publication Details

Access Rights Type:

open

Post date:

24 Oct 2007

Constitutionalising the franchise and the status quo: the High Court on prisoner voting rights

Timor-Leste’s bill of rights: a preliminary history

Papua New Guinea under the O’Neill government: has there been a shift in political style?

Expert panel on constitutional recognition of local government

Reintegration of Indigenous prisoners

Burma’s 2015 national elections

Global judicial handbook on environmental constitutionalism

Mate! Citizens, aliens and 'real Australians': the High Court and the case of Amos Ame

Does the High Court disagree more often in constitutional cases?

Judicial conduct: crafting a system that enhances institutional integrity

The High Court on constitutional law: the 2013 statistics