Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Organisation

Centre for Climate Economics and Policy (ANU)

Owning Institution:
Working paper

Who should bear the cost of China’s carbon emissions embodied in goods for exports?


This paper recommends specific actions that need to be taken internationally as well as domestically in order to effectively control the embedded CO2 emissions in China’s trade. China’s capital-intensive, export-oriented, spectacular economic growth since launching its open-door policy and economic reforms in late 1978 not only has created jobs and has lifted millions of the...
Working paper

Financing adaptation to climate-induced retreat from coastal inundation and erosion


This paper examines an innovative proposal in the form of mortgage contingent loans which could minimise government involvement in protecting beachfront property, and therefore the risk to taxpayers.
Working paper

Challenges in mitigating Indonesia's CO2 emission: the importance of managing fossil fuel combustion


This paper argues the importance for Indonesia to start developing strategies to mitigate its emissions from fossil fuel combustion. Indonesia is among the largest 25 carbon dioxide emitting countries when considering only fossil fuels, and among the top three or five when emissions due to deforestation and land use change are included. Emission per capita...
Working paper

Australia's carbon pricing strategies in a global context


This paper analyses the impact of international carbon control measures – and the absence of such measures – on Australian carbon pricing policies at both a theoretical and empirical level. While theory and interest group advocacy suggest a potential case for destination accounting of carbon emissions and border tax adjustments and/or export exemptions, this case...
Working paper

Where in the world is it cheapest to cut carbon emissions? Ranking countries by total and marginal cost of abatement


Countries with low marginal costs of abating carbon emissions may have high total costs, and vice versa, for a given climate mitigation policy. This may help to explain different countries' policy stances on climate mitigation. We hypothesize that, under a common percentage cut in emissions intensity relative to business as usual (BAU), countries with higher...

ADVERTISEMENT