Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Organisation

University of Queensland

Policy report

Policy futures: a reform agenda


It is intended that this publication will serve to increase the accessibility of valuable evidence and experiences to policy-makers within Australia. The University of Queensland and the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust also hope that it will encourage more partnership approaches toward developing public policy that are informed by broad groups of experts, including Churchill Fellows.
Article

Indigenous organisation leaders: balancing tensions between achieving political goals and regulatory requirements


With the new Federal Government’s commitment to the Statement from the Heart, there is a need for new narratives that support the healing of the Indigenous-State relationship in Australia to support better ways of governing that are grounded in mutual respect.
Report

Supporting corporations beyond compliance: advancing ORIC’s governance approach


Indigenous organisations in Australia are regulated by state governments through well-understood and institutionally embedded mechanisms of corporate governance. This research aims to better understand the factors that contribute to Indigenous corporation success ‘beyond compliance’.
Evaluation

Try, test and learn evaluation

Stephanie Cook, Yi-Ping Tseng, Cain Polidano, Guyonne Kalb, Abdullah Mamun, Shabbir Ahmad, Martin O’Flaherty, Jeff Borland, Stefanie Plage, Melindy Bellotti, Elizabeth Kennedy, Wojtek Tomaszewski, Mark Western

The Try, Test and Learn (TTL) Fund, established in 2016, trialled innovative approaches to reduce long-term welfare dependence among at-risk groups. The evaluation found the TTL fund was an appropriate model for generating insights into effective support methods. While short-term impacts were limited, the Fund is expected to effectively help vulnerable groups build capacity, overcome...
Report

Debt, duress and dob-ins: Centrelink compliance processes and domestic violence


This report, looking at Centrelink debts and domestic violence, shows that survivors of domestic violence, usually women, are unfairly held solely responsible for social security debts in situations where the debt was the direct result of their partner’s or ex-partner’s threats, physical violence or coercion.

ADVERTISEMENT