Organisation
Mitchell Institute
Owning Institution:
Alternate Name:
Mitchell Institute for Education and Health Policy
Website:
Report
Years apart: Australia’s growing educational inequality
This report draws on 17 years of data from the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) to understand the extent of the learning gaps by student socioeconomic background across Australia and in each state and territory. The research shows clear, consistent and growing gaps between advantaged and disadvantaged students in Australia.
Report
Assessing the ATAR: exploring the use of the Australian Tertiary Admission Rank (ATAR)
This report examines the relevance of the Australian Tertiary Admission Rank (ATAR). Reflecting on its purpose, the analysis asks, for whom is it working; is its use changing; and what are the implications for national education policy objectives. It finds three in ten school leavers are now admitted to university without reference to an ATAR.
Report
Achieving better and fairer schools: the case for full-service school models in Australia
Australian education data shows inequality begins early and deepens over time. According to this report, a potential solution is the establishment of full-service schools in areas where they are needed most. A full-service school model means taking a wraparound approach to providing the health and wellbeing supports disadvantaged students may need.
Briefing paper
The changing value of a degree: rebalancing Australia’s tertiary pathways
This policy brief analysed 40 years of Australian census data to determine the changing value of a university degree. It recommends replacing the Job Ready Graduates funding regime and diversifying post-secondary school pathways.
Report
Research spotlight: the Australian Early Development Census 2024
This report analyses the 2024 Australian Early Development Census results, showing increased levels of developmental vulnerability in Australian children. There is also a continued trend of worrying levels of developmental vulnerability amongst children living in the most disadvantaged areas. It finds that without targeted strategies, educational inequity will deepen, not narrow.