Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Mixed evaluation approaches

Description

Mixed evaluation methods is when a policy or program is assessed through a more than one evaluation approach e.g. process and impact.

Subject Hierarchy
Current term
Mixed evaluation approaches
Permalinks
APO URI

ADVERTISEMENT

Evaluation

Evaluation of the Eating Disorders Medicare Benefit Schedule items

Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Phillipa Hay, Genevieve Pepin, Tracey Wade, Long Khanh, Dao Le, Deborah Mitchison, Susan Hart, Jaclyn Broadbent, Linda Byrne, Hannah Jarman, Alexandra Aulich, Jeanette Chan, Miranda Chilver, Caitlin Clague, Georgia Craigie, Brooke Donnelly, Jacqui Edwards, Natasha Hall, Catherine Johnson, Lyndal Kilgannon, Claudia Liu, Courtney McLean, Alemayehu Mekonnen, Madelon North, Rebecca Sheils, Andrew Tan

This process and outcome evaluation of the Eating Disorders Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) items aimed to understand if it is meeting the needs of those delivering and receiving the services. It found people who had received treatment reported significantly lower levels of eating disorder symptoms after treatment. Wholesale retention of the current items is recommended.
Evaluation

State of the Environment 2021 report evaluation

Clem Bailey

The State of the Environment Report provides a review of Australia’s natural environment every five years to shape strategy, policy and action to influence behaviours and actions taken to prevent further environmental decline in Australia. This evaluation of the report identified 25 recommendations to improve the communication and promotion, accessibility and utility of the report.
Evaluation

Independent evaluation of the JobKeeper payment: final report


The evaluation of the JobKeeper payment considered both the impact and processes of the entire payment. The effectiveness of JobKeeper was assessed in terms of achieving its objectives. Lessons learned from the design and implementation were also recorded with a view to informing future policy responses. This report details the key findings of the evaluation.
Evaluation

Evaluation of the Co-Location Pilot: final report


This evaluation assessed a $10.4 million pilot co-locating 22 child protection and policing officials at family law courts to improve information sharing for child and family safety. Using mixed methods including stakeholder interviews, workshops, and surveys, it found successful implementation across 15 registries with improved information sharing, quality and timeliness, though clarity challenges remained. Nine...
Evaluation

Evaluation of Monash University’s accredited training for sexual violence response


This report describes the findings of an evaluation of Monash University's accredited training on sexual violence response. The evaluation recommended the course continue to be offered to frontline professionals and that consideration be given to whether there are particular professions towards which the course should be targeted or marketed.