Fixing frictions: ‘sludge audits’ around the world
Governments worldwide are increasingly adopting behavioural science methodologies to address 'sludge' – the unjustified frictions impeding people's access to government services and exacerbating psychological burdens. Sludge audits, grounded in behavioural science, provide a structured approach for identifying, quantifying, and preventing sludge in public services and government processes.
This paper delineates good practice principles, derived from ten case studies conducted during the International Sludge Academy, aimed at promoting the integration of sludge audit methodologies into public governance and service design. By enhancing government efficiency and bolstering public trust in government, these principles contribute to the broader agenda on administrative simplification, digital services, and public sector innovation.
Key recommendations
- Establish clear and meaningful commitments to user-centred government services.
- Proactively integrate feedback into sludge audits by engaging with the public throughout the process in the form of interviews, onsite visits and surveys.
- Evaluation should align with the type and resource availability, with teams conducting randomised controlled trials, A/B tests or before-and-after comparisons.
- Establish clear and meaningful commitments to user-centred government services.
