Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Sensitivity Warning

First Peoples

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples should be aware that this resource may contain images or names of people who have since passed away.

Working paper
Document cover
ShareSHARE

Research review on the effectiveness of youth and rangatahi mental health early intervention and secondary prevention approaches

Publisher
Mental health Mental depression Anxiety Preventative health Māori Youth Youth services First Nations youth Early intervention services New Zealand
Resources
Attachment Size
download linkResearch review 1.42 MB
Description

Adolescence and young adulthood are sensitive periods for the development of mental distress, and timely support can prevent early signs of distress from escalating. This review examines the effectiveness of early intervention and secondary prevention approaches for supporting the mental health and wellbeing of young people and rangatahi aged 12-24 years, with a particular focus on those experiencing low to moderate distress.

The review draws on a structured scan of published and grey literature, identifying 20 evaluation papers covering 16 interventions across therapy-based brief interventions, community-based services, e-therapy, digital tools and family-integrated approaches. Overall, the evidence suggests that many early intervention and secondary prevention supports, including brief and low-intensity approaches, can reduce distress and improve wellbeing, functioning and coping. Effects were most consistent for broad outcomes such as distress, wellbeing and functioning, while findings for anxiety and depressive symptoms were more mixed.

Accessibility, youth-friendly delivery, sustained engagement and co-design with young people emerged as important enablers of effectiveness. Culturally appropriate, co-designed and Indigenous-led approaches also appear important for improving acceptability and engagement for rangatahi Māori. However, the evidence base remains uneven, with a need for stronger evaluation of what works best, for whom and under what delivery conditions. 

Publication Details
DOI:
10.29310/WP.2026.07
Access Rights Type:
open
Series:
Motu Working Paper 26-07