Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Organisation

University of Melbourne

Report

High performance manufacturing workplaces initial findings (September 2014)


The Australian Government Department of Industry commissioned the Centre for Workplace Leadership (University of Melbourne) to conduct a study that investigates the use of management practices that increase performance and innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector. This paper presents the initial findings.
Report

Impact of the Australian higher education funding reforms


Graduates, especially women, can expect a substantial increase in the time taken to pay off their student loans under proposed changes to Australia’s higher education sector University, according to this paper. Abstract This brief explores the potential impact on the time students take to repay their tuition loans of changes proposed by the Australian Government...
Transcript

China’s energy transition: effects on global climate and sustainable development


This lecture explores China's new model of growth and the way it is affecting the chances of avoiding human-induced climate change. Overview China's rapid energy-intensive growth in the first eleven years of this century accelerated the world's rush towards dangerous climate change. A new model of economic growth in China began to change the relationship...
Journal article

Judicial conduct: crafting a system that enhances institutional integrity

This article proffers an alternative system for handling complaints about the judiciary, tailored to fit within Australia's constitutional constraints whilst promoting the institutional integrity of the judiciary. Abstract Judges are human. It is their humanity that allows them to pass judgement on the complexities of fact and law in cases before them. However, their humanity...
Journal article

Constitutional amendment rules and interpretive fidelity to democracy

Fidelity to ‘democracy’ is frequently assumed to be an important evaluative criterion for selecting between competing theories of constitutional interpretation. This article interrogates that assumption by examining a widely deployed argument against progressive judicial interpretation associated with ‘formalist’ theories.