Economic evaluation
Alternative labels
Value for money evaluation
Evaluation
Independent evaluation of supported digital mental health services – Phase 2 final report
The Centre for Mental Health at the University of Melbourne conducted an independent evaluation of three government‑funded supported digital mental health services to inform future Australian Government funding, awareness and utilisation efforts. Using a mixed‑methods approach guided by five key evaluation questions, the evaluation offers recommendations to support future policy development and system improvement.
Evaluation
Boarding: investing in outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students
An independent analysis of the existing investment in support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander secondary students attending boarding. This evaluation aims to improve understanding of the benefits and impacts of the existing investment in boarding provision.
Evaluation
Insights from the first six months of JobKeeper
The JobKeeper Payment was a wage subsidy and income support program delivered in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report presents the Australian Treasury's analysis on the first six months of the JobKeeper Payment (to 27 September 2020), reflecting on the design and initial impacts of JobKeeper as a key element of the...
Evaluation
Cao Lanh Bridge impact evaluation report
The Cao Lanh Bridge Project (CLBP) aimed to improve transport services in Vietnam's Mekong Delta region by addressing the difficulty of crossing major rivers by ferry. This mixed-method impact evaluation applied the difference-in-differences method to data from 3 surveys and conducted a benefit-cost analysis. The evaluation found the Bridge Project had positive impacts on households...
Evaluation
Sporting Schools Program evaluation: final report
A process and economic evaluation of the School Sports Program that aimed to increase children's participation in sports. The evaluation found the program had been successful in many ways and provided value for money. The report recommends no immediate changes to the design of the program but does outline improvements that could be made.