Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Paris Agreement

Alternative labels
Paris agreement on climate change
Subject Hierarchy
Current term
Paris Agreement
Permalinks
APO URI

ADVERTISEMENT

Discussion paper

Meat: the future – a roadmap for delivering 21st-century protein


Academic analysis shows it will be impossible for a global population of 10 billion to consume the amount and type of protein typical of current diets in North America and Europe if we want to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This paper identifies four specific strategies for delivering 21st-century protein.
Working paper

Scaling up ambition: leveraging nationally determined contributions and long-term strategies to achieve the Paris Agreement goals


This paper highlights the critical role of long-term strategies (LTSs) and nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in advancing the G20 goal of strong, sustainable, balanced and inclusive growth.
Report

Interim emissions reduction targets for Victoria (2021-2030): final report


This report presents to the Victorian government recommendations for interim carbon emissions targets for 2021-2025 and 2026-2030, indicative trajectories to 2050, advice on opportunities to reduce Victoria’s emissions and the other evidence that was considered in arriving at the recommended targets.
Briefing paper

Taking way too much credit


This paper suggests that the Coalition government’s reliance on dated carbon credits to extinguish over half of its Paris Agreement target might not be authorised, forcing it to purchase last-minute international permits or drastically reduce emissions to cover huge gap.
Discussion paper

A model line-up: comparing economic models of high ambition emission reduction targets


This paper analyses 22 recent modelling reports of the economic impacts of higher ambition targets. Extensive literature shows Australia can achieve higher ambition targets with very small economic impacts. Claims that higher ambition would be ‘economy wrecking’ or ‘apocalyptic’ are not credible.