First Peoples
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples should be aware that this resource may contain images or names of people who have since passed away.
Co-design versus faux-design of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health policy: a critical review
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Co-design versus faux-design of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health policy | 4.11 MB |
The ongoing failure of health policies to effectively support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is further deepening
the inequities brought about by colonisation. A co-design approach that centres Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, knowledges, values and practices offers a policy development solution that more effectively addresses prevailing systemic discrimination and inequities. However, while co-design terminology is increasing in Australian health policymaking, many cases apply only tokenistic or superficial co-design practices; an approach that the authors term ‘faux-design’.
This paper critically reviews current approaches to co-designing and faux-designing health policy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. It provides an overview of key concepts, principles and benefits of the co-design methodology; highlights concerns with contemporary practices; and outlines critical issues to address to achieve effective co-designed health policies.
Case studies are included to illustrate aspects of best practice. Finally, the authors pose questions to spark debate and shape the future of co-designing policy with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
