Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Sensitivity Warning

First Peoples

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples should be aware that this resource may contain images or names of people who have since passed away.

Report
Document cover
ShareSHARE

Co-design versus faux-design of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health policy: a critical review

Khwanruethai Ngampromwongse, Rebecca Murray, Louise Mitchell, Kate Wilkinson, Christina Heris, Lisa Whop
Publisher
Best practice Policymaking Co-design Policy failure Health inequity Aboriginal people (Australia) First Peoples health Torres Strait Islander people Australia Health 2025
Description

The ongoing failure of health policies to effectively support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is further deepening
the inequities brought about by colonisation. A co-design approach that centres Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, knowledges, values and practices offers a policy development solution that more effectively addresses prevailing systemic discrimination and inequities. However, while co-design terminology is increasing in Australian health policymaking, many cases apply only tokenistic or superficial co-design practices; an approach that the authors term ‘faux-design’.

This paper critically reviews current approaches to co-designing and faux-designing health policy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. It provides an overview of key concepts, principles and benefits of the co-design methodology; highlights concerns with contemporary practices; and outlines critical issues to address to achieve effective co-designed health policies. 

Case studies are included to illustrate aspects of best practice. Finally, the authors pose questions to spark debate and shape the future of co-designing policy with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Publication Details
DOI:
10.48455/af9v-ev07
ISBN:
978-1-922885-14-2
License type:
CC BY-NC
Access Rights Type:
open