While you’re here… help us stay here.

Are you enjoying open access to policy and research published by a broad range of organisations? Please donate today so that we can continue to provide this service.


The effectiveness of parliamentary oversight in defence procurement: an international comparison of Joint Strike Fighter procurements

Defence Australian Defence Force Parliament of Australia Defence expenditure Australia United Kingdom Canada Netherlands
Attachment Size
apo-nid102826.pdf 394.68 KB

The internationally collaborative and generally synchronous Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program offers an opportunity to compare procurement oversight between different partner nations. In democracies, parliamentary oversight plays an important role in public accountability and transparency.

This paper assesses the effectiveness of the Australian Parliament and its supporting agencies in conducting oversight of major defence procurements in comparison with other nations, using the JSF procurement as a case study. It compares the roles and effectiveness of Australia’s parliamentary committees, the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) and the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) with the equivalent committees and agencies of the United States, Canada, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Parliamentary oversight in Australia is hampered by the different roles of different committees and the organisations which contribute to Parliamentary oversight, resulting in fractured rather than unified oversight.

Publication Details
License type:
Access Rights Type:
Publication place: