An external report into Creative Australia's governance, decision-making and risk management processes in relation to Australia’s participation in the 2026 Venice Biennale. The review examined whether the processes and governance practices that supported critical decisions were adequate, and how those processes and practices might be improved in future. It provides nine recommendations. The Board has accepted all the recommendations.

Key insights

• The Board and Creative Australia have obligations to stakeholders beyond the creative community. The duty to promote 'the proper use and management of public resources' indicates that the broader Australian community, including its taxpayers, are another important stakeholder.
• There was no single or predominant failure of process, governance or decision making that resulted in the decision to rescind the selection of the artistic team. There were, however, a series of missteps, assumptions and missed opportunities.
• The selection of an artistic team for a Venice Biennale is a decision of a different kind and magnitude to the bulk of Creative Australia’s decision-making meaning that more rigour is needed in the decision-making process. 

Recommendations

1. Develop a clearly documented risk identification policy and procedure for the Venice Biennale selection process.
2. Ensure appropriate tools are available to guide and support staff.
3. Expand the role of the Executive in the selection process.
4. The Board should approve the risk policy and procedures and assess their application.
5. Ensure the risk policy and procedures are known.
6. Commission biennial independent reviews.
7. Ensure all staff and Board members understand the range of responsibilities and accountabilities of Creative Australia.
8. Incorporate crisis management planning into the selection process.
9. The Board should develop a clear process for how rescission decisions will be made.