Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Report
Document cover
ShareSHARE

From box-ticking to trust-building: enhancing integrity in public consultation

Publisher
Open government Government accountability Government integrity Public consultation Public trust Australia
Resources
Attachment Size
download linkFrom box-ticking to trust-building 6.61 MB
Description

Too often, government consultation is treated as a box-ticking exercise – yet it sits at the heart of legitimacy, accountability and public trust. This paper shows how public consultation integrity can deliver better decisions and reduce the disproportionate influence of vested interests, but only when consultation is genuine, accessible and done early – before outcomes are locked in.

Drawing on an audit of Commonwealth law, the paper identifies 129 federal statutes containing 340 consultation provisions, spanning high-impact portfolios including environment, health, Indigenous affairs and workplace relations.

The report finds recurring failures: predetermined 'performative' consultations, unequal access (where well-resourced actors are privileged), inadequate time and information, weak analysis and poor reporting back. It also flags a troubling rise in closed-door consultation through non-disclosure agreements, which can obscure who is being heard and why.

The key critique is structural: Australia has a 'patchwork' of uneven, often unenforceable consultation duties, with limited oversight. The paper recommends a major reform package: a Commonwealth Public Consultation Act and an independent Office of Public Consultation to set standards, run a whole-of-government consultation portal, audit practice and handle complaints.

Publication Details
License type:
All Rights Reserved
Access Rights Type:
open