Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Organisation

The Australia Institute

Acronym:
TAI
Discussion paper

Gas bagging: the case against the Beetaloo Basin gas development


This analysis shows that in most cases, the alleged benefits of Beetaloo gas development being touted by the NT Government, and subsidised by the Australian Government, are in direct conflict with observable, publicly-available economic data, and also with much of the economic, emissions and fiscal modelling undertaken to date.
Discussion paper

University councils, transparency and the Adelaide University merger: accountability at Australia’s public universities


Howard-era reforms to higher education have led to a lack of transparency and democratic accountability within the councils that govern Australia’s public universities. These issues are epitomised in the proposed merger of the University of Adelaide with the University of South Australia, a case which shows why reform is needed, argue the authors of this...
Discussion paper

A better Stage 3: fairer tax cuts for more Australians


The authors of this paper argue that the Stage 3 tax cuts are a high-cost, inequitable policy. They assert that re-examining the policy presents the Albanese Government with the opportunity to deliver bigger and fairer tax cuts to most Australians, while providing scope for greater spending on infrastructure, programs or benefits.
Submission

Consultants: structurally unsound


The Australia Institute has prepared this submission for the Federal Senate inquiry examining the conflict of interest risks associated with government contracts with consultants, the need for better oversight, and the case for professional standards in the consulting sector.
Discussion paper

Food waste in Australia and how supermarkets profit from it


This report explores reasons why some of the recommendations surrounding food waste minimisation are not be being achieved. A key factor appears that retailers have little incentive to reduce waste, for the simple reason that doing so would cost them money.