While you’re here… help us stay here.
Are you enjoying open access to policy and research published by a broad range of organisations? Please donate today so that we can continue to provide this service.
|Comparative analysis of budget utilisation in individualised funding models||337.27 KB|
This report was commissioned by the Australian Government’s Department of Social Services to inform mechanisms that will optimise utilisation of NDIS packages. The report examines schemes, nationally and internationally, with similar features to the NDIS in order to:
In this report, a utilisation rate refers to a comparison of the monetary value of individual budgets allocated against the budget expended. The term individualised funding is used to describe models of funding deployed via direct payment to an individual or through an intermediary that allow an individual to make choices about expenditure to meet their needs.
The research that informs this report is based on a desktop review of relevant literature and interviews with national and international experts. The literature review involved a search of peer reviewed literature, as well as focussed reviews of grey literature and follow up contact with relevant organisations, where able, for additional data. Interviews were conducted with seven international experts exploring what utilisation rates different systems experience, whether targets are used around utilisation rates and how different systems have sought to shift utilisation rates.
This data identifies a range of different national and international individual funding schemes. Some of these have comparable features to the NDIS, but there are also some important differences meaning that we need to take care in drawing lessons from these.
Commonwealth study into NDIS Plan Utilisation: synthesis report https://apo.org.au/node/314615
NDIS Utilisation Project: understanding drivers of Plan Utilisation from the po… https://apo.org.au/node/314666
NDIS Plan Utilisation Project: describing, understanding and explaining inequal… https://apo.org.au/node/314668