Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Evidence-based policy

Alternative labels
Evidence-informed policy
Subject Hierarchy
Broader terms
Policymaking
Current term
Evidence-based policy
Narrower terms
Permalinks
APO URI

ADVERTISEMENT

Briefing paper

Partnerships and collaborative advantage in primary care reform


Increasingly, partnerships and collaborations are becoming more common, and they will continue to do so because they provide for a strategic approach to the development of common agendas and pooled resourcing, to improve health outcomes. The Peninsula Model for Primary Health Planning is a good example of this approach, using the Commonwealth’s commissioned logic model...
Guide

What works? Learning from the literature


What works and at what cost? It’s a question commonly asked by funders, policy makers and practitioners, seeking to make the best use of available resources. To make informed decisions, a sensible first step is to look at what may be learned from past experience and research. However, this may not be as straightforward as...
Discussion paper

Where is the evidence? Realising the value of grey literature for public policy and practice


This paper discusses the ways in which the internet has profoundly changed how we produce, use and collect research and information for public policy and practice, particularly focusing on the benefits and challenges presented by grey literature. The authors argue that grey literature (i.e. material produced and published by organisations without recourse to the commercial...
Report

Net advantage: securing our fisheries management


This report argues that Australian commercial fisheries can gain a global competitive edge by embracing the benefits of marine reserves.
Report

Facilitating the use of research in policy development and implementation


Three research projects funded by VCCCAR were selected to study research-to-policy interventions that might better facilitate the use of their respective results. These case studies were selected because they had progressed to a point that aligned with the time table of our “Research-to-Policy” project and they were amenable to interventions that might facilitate knowledge use.