Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Evaluation
Document cover
ShareSHARE

Empowering YOUth Initiatives: consolidated learnings report

Ulises Garcia, Robyn Henderson, Mark Jones, Bella Liao-Masters, Bradley McKenzie, Ben McNally, Athos Nicolaou, Kate Puniard, Jo Virgona, Dean McDonald, Charmian Huggett
Publisher
Career development Young workers Youth unemployment Long-term unemployment Labour market Mixed methods (research) Government services Impact evaluation Process evaluation Australia
Resources
Attachment Size
download linkEmpowering YOUth Initiatives 1.84 MB
Description

Empowering YOUth Initiatives was an employment program for young people aged 15 to 24 years who were long-term unemployed or at risk of becoming long-term unemployed. It trialled innovative approaches to improving participants’ skills and helping them progress towards sustainable employment. 

The evaluation of the program was underpinned by an overarching strategy of identifying innovative activities and service delivery methods that best supported the intended outcomes, and identifying learnings which could be used to inform ongoing service delivery as well as future policy and program design. Initiatives under the program were evaluated individually and typically combined qualitative fieldwork with participants, providers and stakeholders; initiative and departmental data; and progress reports written by program provider organisations. 

This consolidated report summarises learnings that were common across the individual initiatives, summarising learnings into four themes: activities delivered, the delivery process, specific intervention types and departmental learnings. Some learnings across initiatives included the importance of considering local labour market conditions; supply of participants for services offered; providing work experience opportunities that are otherwise hard to obtain; building trust with participants and managing barriers to participation; and identifying non-vocational barriers and disengagement. The variability of the initiatives limited the ability to evaluate cost effectiveness, however, the initiatives provided evidence of service models that had the potential to reduce costs per outcome.

Publication Details
License type:
CC BY
Access Rights Type:
open