APO resource visit counts have been improved. For more information, see our Policies & Guidelines

Report

Treaties and self-determination: case studies from international jurisdictions

27 Jun 2018
DOI

http://doi.org/10.4225/50/5b331fb1c5506
Description

This guide provides case studies of international jurisdictions that have historic treaties or modern treaty-making processes, self-governance arrangements, and other mechanisms aimed at realising self-determination for Indigenous peoples. The modern treaty processes in Canada are particularly relevant as they provide an example of how treaty-making can work in contemporary practice. However, the historic treaties of New Zealand and the United States of America (USA) are also useful to consider, principally in relation to their modern relevance and significance. This paper further highlights other mechanisms aimed at achieving self-determination in Sweden, Norway and Finland, such as the establishment of Indigenous parliaments.

As the treaty process in Victoria is in its developmental stages, this publication is not intended to be comparative. Rather, it provides an overview of the nature and scope of treaties and other forms of self-determination in jurisdictions with similar historical, socio-cultural and political contexts to our own.

This paper is the third in a series of research products by the Parliamentary Library related to treaty and treaty-making processes.

Publication Details
Identifiers: 
doi: 
10.4225/50/5b331fb1c5506
Issue: 
Research note no. 8 June 2018
Language: 
License Type: 
CC BY-NC-ND
Published year only: 
2018
297
Share
Share
Subject Areas
Advertisement